Facundo Mena vs Botic Van De Zandschulp Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
F. Mena vs B. Van De Zandschulp

Facundo Mena

ARG

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

6'0" (183 cm)

Height

6'2" (188 cm)

401

C. Rank

127

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$140.1K

Career Money

$3.7M

Right-Handed

Plays

Right-Handed

Botic Van De Zandschulp

NED

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

6'0" (183 cm)

Height

6'2" (188 cm)

401

C. Rank

127

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$140.1K

Career Money

$3.7M

Right-Handed

Plays

Right-Handed

Head-to-head: Mena 1 - 0 Zandschulp

They have played 3 sets in total, with Facundo Mena winning 2 and Botic Van De Zandschulp winning 1. The last match between Facundo Mena and Botic Van De Zandschulp was at the M25+H Arlon, 27-06-2019, Round: R2, Surface: Clay, with Facundo Mena getting the victory 3-6 6-0 6-3.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Mena	1
Zandschulp	0

Last 1 H2H Matches:

(R2) M25+H Arlon(06-27-19)

Stats

Facundo Mena

Botic Van De Zandschulp

F. Mena vs B. V. D. Zandschulp H2H Profile

F. Mena	Stats	B. V. D. Zandschulp
$140,110	Career Prize Money	$3,738,275
56.81% (513-390)	Career Total W/L	60.83% (382-246)
1	Clay	0
15	Titles	7
1	Total H2H Matches	0
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	43.24% (16-21)

F. Mena vs B. V. D. Zandschulp Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Facundo Mena has won 46.64% of points on their second serve, while Botic Van De Zandschulp has won 45.24%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Facundo Mena, in recent form, has won 43.42% of their opponent's second serve points, while Botic Van De Zandschulp has won 46.17%. The same stats for first serve returns are 23.36% and 24.88% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Facundo Mena has saved 58.92% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Botic Van De Zandschulp has saved 55.76% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Facundo Mena has won 45.45% of matches played (W/L 20/24), with Botic Van De Zandschulp winning 48.44% (W/L 31/33) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Facundo Mena has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 67% (W/L 4/2), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 33% (W/L 1/2). Botic Van De Zandschulp has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 67% (W/L 97/60), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 44% (W/L 12/15).
Player level: In the last year, Facundo Mena has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 45.71% of matches (W/L 16/19), where as Botic Van De Zandschulp has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 50.00% of matches (W/L 19/19). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Facundo Mena winning 1 times and Botic Van De Zandschulp being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Facundo Mena winning 2 and Botic Van De Zandschulp winning 1.
The last match between Facundo Mena and Botic Van De Zandschulp was at the M25+H Arlon, 27-06-2019, Round: R2, Surface: Clay, with Facundo Mena getting the victory 3-6 6-0 6-3.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:56:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Facundo Mena has played against opponents with an average rank of 284.95 while Botic Van De Zandschulp has played against players with an average rank of 140.36.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Facundo Mena has won 40% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Botic Van De Zandschulp has won 45% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Facundo Mena has converted 27.68% of breakpoint opportunities, and Botic Van De Zandschulp has converted 30.39% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Facundo Mena vs Botic Van De Zandschulp Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

F. Mena vs B. V. D. Zandschulp H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

F. Mena	Stats	B. V. D. Zandschulp
1	H2H Matches Won	0
2	Sets Won	1
15	Games Won	9
4	Aces (Total)	0
3	Total Double Faults	7
1:56:0	Average Match Time	1:56:0
58% (42/73)	1st Serve %	64% (50/78)
69% (29/42)	1st Serve Win %	54% (27/50)
45% (14/31)	2nd Serve Win %	43% (12/28)
60% (6/10)	Break Pts Won %	60% (3/5)
50% (39/78)	Return Points Win %	41% (30/73)
100% (1/1)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	Deciding Set Win %	0% (0/1)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/1)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	100% (1/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/0)

Recent Performance Stats

F. Mena Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Montevideo Challenger - 10-11-2025
R1 Joao Lucas Reis Da SilvaJ. Lucas	W	3-6 6-1 6-2	Stats
Q3 Nicolas BarrientosN. Barrientos	W	6-3 6-4	Stats
Q1 Benjamin KittayB. Kittay	W	6-4 7-6(3)	Stats
Lima 3 Challenger - 03-11-2025
Q3 Nicolas KickerN. Kicker	L	3-6 6-2 6-3	Stats
Q1 David Jorda SanchisD. Jorda	W	6-1 6-2	Stats

View All

B. V. D. Zandschulp Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Hellenic Championship - Athens - 03-11-2025
R1 Stan WawrinkaS. Wawrinka	L	2-6 7-6(5) 7-5	Stats
Rolex Paris Masters - Paris - 27-10-2025
Q3 Ethan QuinnE. Quinn	L	6-3 7-6(4)	Stats
Q1 Jenson BrooksbyJ. Brooksby	W	4-6 6-3 6-3	Stats
Swiss Indoors Basel - Basel - 20-10-2025
R2 Reilly OpelkaR. Opelka	L	7-6(5) 6-7(7) 6-3	Stats
R1 Jiri LeheckaJ. Lehecka	W	6-2 6-2	Stats

View All

F. Mena vs B. V. D. Zandschulp Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

F. Mena	Stats	B. V. D. Zandschulp
56.81% (513/390)	YTD Win/Loss	60.83% (382/246)
55.16% (1134/922)	Sets Win/Loss	57.84% (874/637)
51.53% (9854/9267)	Games Win/Loss	52.97% (7595/6742)
56.49% (74/57)	Hard Win/Loss	57.81% (74/54)
56.88% (434/329)	Clay Win/Loss	61.59% (178/111)
66.67% (4/2)	Indoor Hard W/L	64.13% (118/66)
33.33% (1/2)	Grass Win/Loss	44.44% (12/15)
0.29	Aces Per Game	0.45
2722	Aces Total	3139
0.16	Double Faults Per Game	0.33
1533	Total Double Faults	2297
1:3:15	Average Match Time	1:36:56
517.46	Average Opponent Rank	393.63
55% (21216/38837)	1st Serve %	62% (25788/41885)
70% (14921/21216)	1st Serve Win %	72% (18493/25788)
50% (8878/17621)	2nd Serve Win %	48% (7758/16100)
43% (1762/4099)	Break Points Won % (Total)	43% (1881/4385)
41% (16201/39820)	Return Points Win %	40% (17540/43322)
25.00% (4/12)	Slam W/L	58.93% (33/23)
0.00% (0/2)	Masters W/L	48.21% (27/29)
0% (0/0)	Cups W/L	60.00% (12/8)
26.32% (5/14)	Main Tour W/L	51.30% (79/75)
51.64% (189/177)	Challenger W/L	63.33% (76/44)
63.00% (315/185)	Futures W/L	69.82% (155/67)
57% (509/895)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	62% (354/572)
0% (0/1)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	49% (21/43)
57% (155/270)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	53% (108/205)
57% (146/256)	Deciding Set Win %	57% (117/206)
87% (488/426)	1st Set Won, Won Match	89% (359/319)
13% (488/61)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	11% (359/39)
21% (415/87)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	23% (267/62)